5 Day Forecast: Passing Showers and Hellfire

          We’re writing about this because it seems that beyond the peripheral vision of many Americans, a quiet and ghastly drama is unfolding. For those who are there, of course, the chaos and horror are anything but quiet.  But it’s not being talked about much in the news, in churches, or anywhere else, for that matter– but it’s something that has been on our hearts for a long time.

We firmly believe that this is an issue that everyone should be able to agree on, regardless of our political or religious persuasions. Both political parties have supported (and expanded) the drone program, but the implications of it are so anti-human that this continuing phenomenon demands the attention– and the resistance– of people of compassion. With that goal of stirring compassionate people (and especially followers of Jesus) to action, A. and T. have co-authored this post to look into the human cost of drones, as well as to examine the question of whether this “anti-terrorism” strategy might actually be increasing the risk of terrorism in the United States and around the world.

A couple of months ago, we read an interesting Kindle Single called Aftershock: The Blast That Shook Psycho Platoon (download it for free here) about some of the struggles US soldiers face as they come back from either Afghanistan or Iraq.  It talks about the effects of two conditions: post-traumatic stress disorder (PSTD) and mild traumatic brain injury.  Aftershock follows the lives of one platoon that experienced a rocket attack while they were in their barracks at a main base in Iraq.  The rocket barely missed their building, and fortunately, only one of the men experienced minor physical injuries from shrapnel.  Unfortunately, all of the men experienced some psychological injuries from the distress of a near-death experience and from the blast waves emanating from the rocket.  Research is showing that the explosions of these bombs, land mines, and rockets can rattle the brain so much that the end result is like a concussion. Concussions are dangerous enough for football players or other people who suffer accidental head trauma, but the Army’s researchers are finding that concussions are even more severe for soldiers since usually the concussions are sustained in the middle of combat when a flood of chemicals like adrenaline are surging through the brain.

Concussions are strange and unpredictable injuries: some people experience no long-term effects from them at all, while others experience headaches, memory loss and other life-altering symptoms. When these brain-altering injuries occur during traumatic events– like losing friends and fighting for your life in battle– they can be compounded by post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Over the past few years, the combination of those two conditions has manifested in many (but certainly not all) returning war veterans as an inability to adjust to civilian life, irrationally violent behavior, and suicide (the VA estimates that 18 U.S. war veterans commit suicide every day).

         While the effects of bombs on soldiers is concerning enough, it’s even scarier to think about the effects of collective PTSD and serious brain injury on the millions of civilians in these war zones. Under Obama’s administration (the same Obama who won a Nobel PEACE prize), the number of drone attacks in Pakistan and Middle Eastern countries like Yemen has sky rocketed: both the CIA and military both are using these un-manned aircraft to kill whomever they wish from a safe distance.
          The psychological impact of unpredictable, repeated drone attacks on a civilian population is huge– it creates a sense of unending, inescapable terror. In addition to targeting individuals who make it onto a “kill list” based on CIA intelligence, there are certain “signature” behaviors or patterns of movement which can cause a person to be targeted by a drone even if there is no prior evidence of terrorist activity. For example, there have been several instances in Pakistan where some men the government had labeled as insurgents were killed in a drone attack, and drones later returned to attack the people who gathered to attend the men’s funeral. Presumably family, friends, and neighbors who happened to know the men showed up at the funeral and were killed just for knowing someone on the CIA’s kill list…  often, just being a male of military age is enough to justify your execution (after the fact) as a possible insurgent. Not only that, but so-called “double tap” drone strikes have also frequently targeted people who rush to rescue those injured in an initial attack. The drone attacks are like drive by shootings, just more high-tech.  People who happen to know the insurgents (and have no choice in how they are involved), innocent neighbors, and even those who try to rescue the injured after an attack can all become victims of this terrifying anti-terror strategy which asks no questions, hears no witnesses, and executes before there is any chance for legal defense.
Picture

So-called “collateral damage”.
          If being in proximity to a bomb blast– like a drone missile– can have disastrous effects on the brain and can create PTSD, then isn’t it reasonable to think then that an innocent Afghan, Yemeni, or Pakistani teenager who survives one or multiple drone attacks because they happened to live in the same village as a targeted insurgent might suffer the kind of brain damage and PTSD that would lead him to act violently and irrationally without regard for his own life as he tries to cope with the trauma? Might these traumatized and grief-stricken youth who have lost family and friends to American drone strikes be especially vulnerable to the sales pitches of Al-Qaeda-type recruitment that promises justice and revenge for what they have suffered? As a strategy for decreasing the risk of terrorism on U.S. soil, the use of drones is self-defeating.

Not only does it create more enemies for the United States by tarnishing the country’s image abroad and boosting Al-Qaeda’s recruitment, it also sets a dangerous precedent for other nations to follow. Will the world become a safer or more dangerous place if nations like Iran, North Korea, China, and others follow the example of the world’s leading superpower by using drones to carry out extrajudicial killings inside the territory of other sovereign nations with whom they are not even at war? By the low standards we have set thus far, Iran theoretically has the right to strike Israel with drones (which they are acquiring) in the name of national security, and China is entitled to use drones  to kill off the pesky Taiwanese or Tibetan leaders who threaten its regime’s power.  I think we can all agree that those are some absurd and terrifying possibilities.

Picture

“Screamin’ Demon” AAI RQ-7A Shadow drone
          At the very least, we as Christians should catch the irony of both President Bush and President Obama using weapons with names like the “Predator” drone, which rains down “Hellfire” missiles, while they simultaneously claim to seek God’s direction in exercising their power as “Christian” leaders. It seems that they’ve either had a miscommunication in prayer or that Jesus has uncharacteristically commanded them to rain down hellfire on their enemies.

But hopefully as the Body of Jesus we can sense more than irony– hopefully the Spirit will open our eyes to see the injustice of murdering innocent people, especially children, in our endless pursuit of greater security for ourselves and our children. Hopefully we sense the danger in ignoring human rights, human lives, domestic and international law in the name of defending our rights. God willing, we will recognize that this violent disregard for the lives of people from a culture and a religion not our own actually cheapens our regard for our own lives and makes a mockery of our supposed devotion to the God who created us all, who imprinted us with His image, who lived and died as one of us, and who declared that He is forever present in the enemy, the outsider, the needy and the rejected ones.

Our prayer is that as the community of Jesus, we can take up our cross and find creative ways of practicing the active nonviolent love that Jesus taught us, and that we can find the courage to stand against our society as an example of self-sacrificing love in an age of paranoid retaliation.

Source: New feed

Five Years Later

          Five years ago, A. and I came to Thailand for the first time. We hardly knew each other when we arrived, but by the time we left, we had become close friends. A few months later, we would fall in love with each other.  But by the end of our semester abroad, we had already fallen in love with Asia, and especially with the simplicity of village life we had discovered while living with the Karen hill tribe.
Picture

We couldn’t have guessed back then that we would be married just over two years later 🙂

          We’ve stayed in touch with many of the friends we met in Thailand back then, and this week, we were able to fulfill a long-standing hope: we returned to that village with one of our best friends from university to attend our Karen friend’s wedding!  It was amazing to see the whole village and extended family come together to cook and decorate the church with fresh flowers from the market. Everyone brought rice wrapped in little banana leaf packets to contribute to the ongoing feast (it was hard to distinguish one meal from the next since there was always food around!), and everyone took home leftovers at the end. Without being told what to do, everyone seemed to naturally flow into potato peeling or flower arranging or whatever it was that needed to be done at the moment. We also appreciated how casual and low-key everything was—the priority was spending time together with family and friends rather than putting on a show for the guests, so the schedule for the wedding day wasn’t even decided until the day before, and nearly everyone who was invited had also contributed to the preparations beforehand.  Even during the ceremony, various small groups of people sang songs to the couple while kids played on the floor in the middle of everything. And just a few hours afterward, a bunch of us went with the bride and groom to play in a nearby waterfall.
Picture

standing with the bride and groom

Picture

the entrance to the church

Picture

the wedding ceremony

Picture

congratulating the new husband and wife

Picture

A. & I with our friend Alex, who traveled to Thailand with us in 2008, and his girlfriend Susan

          Five years ago, it was 2008. That year marked the beginning of our life together, and the beginning of a long searching that has continued ever since—the pursuit of simplicity, of community, of justice for small, beautiful communities all over the world whose existence is threatened by prejudice, indifference, power, and greed. 

          In the last five years, a lot has changed in Thailand. The city where we lived has gone a lot more “upscale”, looking less distinctively Thai and more like sterile shopping districts plastered with the same multinational brands that you see all over the world.  There are more touristy bars and gimmicks than we remember. Even in some of the village areas that seemed so remote when we first visited, there are now paved roads and even high-speed internet! At the wedding, too, we saw signs of change: young hipsters who have moved from the villages to the city for work wandered around taking pictures with smart phones while older members of the tribe slaughtered animals and prepared food in ways that this youngest generation may have never learned. Most of them were wearing bits and pieces of their traditional tribal clothing over skinny jeans and t-shirts.

          In the last five years, a lot has changed for us personally, too.  W­­­­­­e dated, got engaged, got married, and moved to Asia. We’ve collected more stamps in our passports; we’ve collected more battle scars, more hopes and dreams, and more questions than answers. So much has changed since 2008.  But in many ways, our slum community in India is just another village that has invited us in as part of the tribe.

Source: New feed